Average score of 4.2 is bad, right?<\/h2>\n
In addition to pressure from the importer, online reputation plays at least as big a role. Potential buyers orient themselves extensively on the Internet and are heavily influenced by reviews on Google and other platforms. An average score of 4.2 looks questionable to many consumers, while 4.6 or higher is seen as reliable. This perception makes dealers actively steer toward collecting positive reviews. The moment when a review is requested is rarely coincidental. It often occurs immediately after a positive experience, when the likelihood of a high score is greatest. <\/p>\n
An 8 is no longer good enough<\/h2>\n
It is interesting how the meaning of grades has changed in this context. Whereas an 8 is traditionally a tidy rating, in car land the scale actually functions as a limited rating system in which only the top grades count. Anything below 9 is quickly interpreted internally as a signal that improvement is needed. This creates an area of tension between perception and interpretation. The customer thinks they are being complimented, while the company reads the grade as a warning. This creates a strange dynamic in which employees sometimes explicitly explain to customers how the scale “actually” works. This shifts feedback from spontaneous reflection to almost strategically completed ratings. <\/p>\n
Blur<\/h2>\n
That development raises a broader question about the value of measurement in a highly data-driven industry. Car brands are investing heavily in systems that provide insight into performance and keep it comparable across countries and locations. That provides overview and control, but it also increases the distance between human experience and its numerical translation. When only a 9 or 10 are still considered good, a form of grade inflation occurs. The distinction between an excellent experience and simply good service blurs. The scale thus loses some of its original meaning. <\/p>\n
Satisfied customers<\/h2>\n
For employees in the workplace, this is not an abstract issue. They experience daily pressure to manage expectations and make customers aware of the importance of high scores. That can fray. Service delivery is at its core about satisfied customers, not about optimizing survey results. Current systems also sometimes produce uncomfortable situations where the dealership employee is just short of pleading. <\/p>\n In the mission to achieve the highest possible rating, resources are also used, such as flyers placed in the car after a service. What is remarkable in this is how the customer is influenced with the handing out of stars. The example below illustrates well how “sick” the system actually is. <\/p>\n In the real world, we attach different meanings to these stars, right? Granted: 1 star is seen as ‘bad’ and 2 stars can pass as ‘could be better’. We skip the term ‘mediocre’, which is practically the same as ‘could be better’. In real life, we label 3 stars as ‘okay’ and 4 stars as ‘fine’. The maximum 5 stars represent ‘great’ and not a simple ‘fine’. Car companies’ statements do indicate that by five stars they mean ‘fine’. And that cannot be the intention. It is a tool to influence the average score.<\/p>\n Those who understand the dynamics behind that seemingly simple survey see that a request for a 9 or 10 is rarely meant personally. It is a reflection of an industry in which customer satisfaction is monitored down to the tenth point and in which margins, contracts and online visibility weigh increasingly heavily. The 8 has disappeared not because service has gotten worse, but because the standard has shifted. In that shift lies the real story: not that car companies are asking for compliments, but that they are operating within a system in which less than near-perfect is simply no longer enough. <\/p>\n “Do you think our service is worth five stars too? Then leave your review”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Customer Satisfaction Index Virtually all car brands employ comprehensive customer satisfaction surveys. After a purchase or workshop visit, the customer…","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":161466,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[94,93],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-165885","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-background-en","category-car-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n![\"An](\"https:\/\/autorai.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/beoordeling-bezoek-autobedrijf-onderhoudsbeurt-anoniem-foto1-1280x720.jpg\")
Flyers<\/h2>\n
\n
![\"Something](\"https:\/\/autorai.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/beoordeling-bezoek-autobedrijf-onderhoudsbeurt-anoniem-foto2-1280x720.jpg\")
The standard has shifted<\/h2>\n
\n
\n